Indonesia is the world’s leading palm oil producer and exporter, and the Indonesian palm oil industry has often been accused of the number one cause of deforestation in that country in recent decades. However, the latest data shows that the tide is turning. In 2021, deforestation for oil-palm plantations in Indonesia and Malaysia was at its lowest level in 20 years, at less than 5% of the highest historical levels.
Environmental research organisation Tree Map analyzed the level of palm-driven deforestation. Based on this research, lead author David Gaveau concluded: “We estimate companies converted 22,000 ha and 6,600 ha of ‘primary’ forest to industrial oil palm in 2021 in Indonesia and Malaysian Borneo, respectively. Plantations expanded by 82,000 ha in Indonesia and by 17,000 ha in Sabah and Sarawak. The analysis includes all industrial plantations inside and outside concessions. Based on Landsat and Sentinel-2 Time-series.”
In a similar analysis, Chain Reaction Research concludes that in 2021, in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea combined, 19,000 hectares (ha) of forest and peat were cleared for oil-palm plantation development. This is the lowest level in 20 years.
These findings are confirmed by the research of Satelligence, which clearly links the decline in Indonesian palm oil-driven deforestation to the implementation of No Deforestation, Peat and Exploitation policies of palm oil buyers.
Source: Satelligence (2022, March), LinkedIn post.
What is remarkable about this trend, is that it contradicts the well-known paradigm that high commodity prices equal high levels of deforestation. In 2021, prices were at their highest level since 2010 and this did not lead to increased deforestation. This is clearly visible in this Satelligence figure:
Source: Satelligence (2022, April), Presentation SPOC webinar The case of palm oil & the latest state of play in Indonesia and Malaysia.
So what are the reasons behind these trends?
While the trend is hopeful, it is not certain that the trend will continue. To ensure the level of deforestation continues to drop, it is important to better understand which factors have been instrumental in decreasing the destruction of forests for oil-palm plantations.
Many people have speculated about this. A general conclusion is that it is very difficult to pinpoint any intervention as decisive, but that many forces pushing in the same direction are making the difference. A 2019 study of the Tropical Forest Alliance and Daemeter concluded that “government, private sector and CSOs leveraged the policy environment to achieve impact on the ground“. The six main impact measures of progress and the six critical enablers of progress are represented by TFA and Daemeter in the following figure:
Source: TFA and Daemeter (2019), Decade of Progress: Reducing commodity driven deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Areas of Progress, Drivers and Future priorities, p. 7.
Further research is needed to improve our understanding of what causes decreased deforestation, but in the wake of conclusive evidence, based on the TFA and Daemeter study and other sources, it is safe to say that the following interventions have played and are playing an important role:
- A variety of NGO groups have carried out relentless campaigns against the use of palm oil tainted with deforestation and social controversies. This “created a strong impact on the demand for crude palm oil, particularly in European Union nations”.
- The private sector has played its role via increased demand and uptake of sustainable and certified palm oil. More and more buyers have implemented No Deforestation, Peat and Exploitation policies and started buying 100% RSPO certified sustainable material (CSPO) for all types of palm oil used, including Crude Palm Oil (CPO), Palm Kernel Oil (PKO), Palm Kernel Expeller (PKE) and Palm Oil Derivatives (POD). This often covers the entire corporate group and all countries where the group operates. Chain Reaction Research noted that “none of the 10 largest deforesters in 2021 can be conclusively linked to the NDPE market. Two have links via Fresh Fruit Bunch supplies and minority shares in a mill”.
- In 2018, the RSPO strengthened its principles and criteria for certification with new requirements on deforestation and peatlands.
- Companies, like Unilever, have started to make an effort to move from buying certified material towards a supplier-based approach. In a supplier-based approach buyers try to not only clean up their own supply chain, but cooperate to clean up all supply chains of the supplier. This avoids leakage of unsustainable palm oil to other landscapes and markets. Other examples include Nestlé’s focus on landscape initiatives and the Ferrero ‘Going beyond’ commitment to “explore with our suppliers ways in which we can increase the number of smallholders in our physical supply chain while also ensuring our food safety requirements.“
- Governments in producing countries have implemented more stringent measures to prevent deforestation for oil palm, such as mandatory national certification schemes (ISPO and MSPO) and moratoria on the development of new palm oil plantations in forests or peatland.
- Governments in consuming countries are starting to develop and implement regulatory frameworks that create an enabling environment for producing palm products in a sustainable way, such as the EU Regulation on Deforestation.
- Landscape Initiatives: Both governments and companies collaboratively invested in palm oil producing landscapes to support sustainable agricultural practices, smallholders’ livelihoods, improved land tenure and to protect and restore natural ecosystems. In NI-SCOPS, IDH and Solidaridad cooperate with governments to make producing landscapes “more economically robust and socially just, while protecting and restoring valuable natural resources leading to reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture and land use change.” Another notable example is the Terpercaya Initiative in Indonesia, where instead of certifying sustainability at the level of individual farms or supply chains, sustainability measures are taken across the region.
This list is not exhaustive and obviously further research is required, but it gives a good representation of the variety of stakeholders that are working to strengthen the movement to stop deforestation.
It remains to be seen how the future develops. Saving the world’s forest is a global challenge and responsibility. It is great to see that the desire for conservation and the willingness to decrease deforestation is shared globally amongst farmers, companies, governments, NGOs, local communities and workers. To make progress in the pursuit of deforestation-free production, stakeholders in the palm oil value chain have to further intensify their cooperation.
Co-author of the PLOS ONE study Timer Manurung from Auriga Nusantara said that “the slow-down in expansion offers a chance for the Indonesian government and other stakeholders to work together to improve planning and management of oil palm and other plantations. Encouraging good practices and transparency will serve future generations.” The Sustainable Palm Oil Choice fully agrees and calls for all involved parties to collaborate in making sustainable palm oil value chains a reality.